Supreme's Agree with Constitution

on Thursday, June 26, 2008
In an unusual break from recent tradition, the United States Supreme Court agreed with the Constitution!

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Read more:
The Hill


Complete Ruling (PDF) here.

Even some liberals get it:
''This opinion should usher in a new era in which the constitutionality of government regulations of firearms are reviewed against the backdrop of this important right,''
said Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont.

Vermont as many know, enjoys the lowest incidence of firearm violence in the nation and has no gun laws what so ever.
(The only firearm laws in that state are federal.)

What do you know? Charlton Heston had it right!

Headless for President?

on Monday, June 23, 2008
Has the entire nation lost their heads?



Mandating Hazardous Waste

on Friday, June 20, 2008
A really screwy idea














You've seen these funny looking light bulbs and may even have a few in your home.

Here's what you probably didn't know.


They're dangerous!


That didn't stop Connecticut State Representative Mary Mushinsky (D-85) from trying to force the bulbs into our homes by statute.

The hypocrisy of it all!
Muchinsky has held office for 28 years, and has been a full blown environmental kook the whole time.

It should come as no surprise that she failed to do any fact checking prior to promoting such a hair-brained scheme, nor should we be surprised that none of these "CFL" bulbs are made in the United States; after all, why would a Democrat try to help fellow Americans keep their jobs?

Here Congressman Ted Poe of Texas explains the serious problems these bulbs present.


The EPA even has a whole site dedicated just to the proper disposal of them!

Among other things, if one of these bulbs breaks, it tells us:
Have everyone else leave the area; don't let anyone walk through the mercury on their way out. Make sure all pets are removed from the area. Open all windows and doors to the outside; shut all doors to other parts of the house.

If a spill occurs on carpet, curtains, upholstery or other absorbent surfaces, these contaminated items should be thrown away in accordance with the disposal means outlined below. Only cut and remove the affected portion of the contaminated carpet for disposal.


All this for a light bulb - it's insanity.

Thought for day

on Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Zino Davidoff

Less than a half step from complete teetotaler

on Saturday, June 14, 2008
Well, I've heard it again.

"Do you drink?


Uh...no.
Maybe a glass of wine with dinner with my wife at home; sometimes.
NEVER when we're out at all.

Years (and years and years) ago; sure.
I'm becoming an old geezer and simply don't anymore.

Besides, everyone knows I'd rather have coffee.

I am however asthmatic and use this.



Please note the ingredients.

Thus my breath may allude to alcohol occasionally.

Active Ingredients
Epinephrine in each Inhalation - 0.22 mg

Ingredients
Ascorbic Acid , Alcohol 34% , Dichlorodifluoromethane CFC 12 , Dichlorotetrafluoroethane CFC 114 , Hydrochloric Acid , Nitric Acid , Purified Water


For those of you that wish to spread such a rumor - screw off; you're pond scum.

Caligiuri on the Gas Tax

on Tuesday, June 3, 2008


Connecticut Should Cut Gas Taxes


Connecticut now has the highest gas prices in the nation. While most of the factors that have contributed to this harsh reality are outside our control as a state, there is one important factor that Connecticut can control – the amount we tax gasoline. Reducing our gas taxes is one thing the state can do to provide almost immediate relief to consumers. We should cut those taxes because people desperately need some relief.

Connecticut levies two different taxes on gasoline. The first is a flat tax of 25 cents per gallon. The second tax is known as the Petroleum Gross Receipts Tax. The Gross Receipts Tax is set at a percentage of the wholesale price of petroleum. According to the Independent Connecticut Petroleum Association (ICPA), at the current rate of 7 percent, the Gross Receipts Tax costs consumers approximately 25.7 cents per gallon of gasoline. The Gross Receipts Tax had been set at 5 percent for many years, but a series of increases was instituted in 2005 in order to pay for transportation projects, and that tax is still increasing. It is scheduled to go up again on July 1 when it is scheduled to increase to 7.5%.

A recent story in the Journal Inquirer compared gas prices and gas taxes in Connecticut to our neighboring states of Massachusetts, New York and Rhode Island. That story showed that the difference in gas prices between Connecticut and those other states could be correlated, almost to the penny, to the difference in the amount of gas taxes. For example, Connecticut consumers pay 22 cents more per gallon of gas than consumers in Rhode Island, while the difference in gas taxes is 19.7 cents. Similarly, we pay 28 cents more for a gallon of gas than people in Massachusetts and 27.2 cents more in gas taxes. Finally, when compared to New York, we are paying 8 cents more per gallon of gas and 10.6 more per gallon in gas taxes. As you can see, the difference in gas prices appears to be directly related to the difference in gas taxes; the higher the gas taxes the higher the price of gas. That is why I am convinced that lowering our gas taxes will result in lower gas prices.

Since first coming to office in January 2007, I have proposed eliminating the increases to the Gross Receipts Tax and blocking the future scheduled increases. I was able to show, using figures provided by the state's nonpartisan Office of Fiscal Analysis, that we could do that and still fully fund our transportation projects. My efforts have been defeated to date, but I will continue to push for these reductions as the only thing we can meaningfully do as a state to help consumers at the pumps.

One obstacle to cutting the gas taxes is that the state is now using the surplus tax revenue it generates from the Gross Receipts Tax to help fund the state's general fund budget. With significant budget deficits looming on the horizon, state policymakers will be more reluctant than ever before to lower our gas taxes. My argument to them is that we must decide what our priorities will be. I would rather find the spending cuts we need in order to pay for a reduction in our gas taxes so that we can help people at the pumps, than throw up our hands in despair and say that we cannot cut those taxes because the state is now facing a deficit.

High gas prices are hurting Connecticut's families and businesses. The fact that our state government is contributing to the pain at the pumps is something that should bother all of us. I will continue to work to lower Connecticut's gas taxes